Re: Formatting of Language LRMs

Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com>
Sat, 21 Jun 2014 03:09:25 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Formatting of Language LRMs seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2014-06-17)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2014-06-20)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-20)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-06-21)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-06-21)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs Pidgeot18@verizon.net.invalid (=?UTF-8?B?Sm9zaHVhIENyYW5tZXIg8J+Qpw==?=) (2014-06-22)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs mertesthomas@gmail.com (2014-06-30)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-07-03)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-07-28)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-08-01)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-08-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 03:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: 14-06-010 14-06-016
Keywords: standards
Posted-Date: 21 Jun 2014 12:22:34 EDT

On 2014-06-20, Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> wrote:
> VWG is vastly superior to BNF because it provides a formal specification
> of semantics, in particular the type system, which cannot be expressed
> in BNF.


How do you put this into VWG, semantics and all:


    (lisp-macro with (mystery arguments))


:)

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.