Related articles |
---|
Formatting of Language LRMs seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2014-06-17) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2014-06-20) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-20) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-06-21) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-06-21) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs Pidgeot18@verizon.net.invalid (=?UTF-8?B?Sm9zaHVhIENyYW5tZXIg8J+Qpw==?=) (2014-06-22) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs mertesthomas@gmail.com (2014-06-30) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-07-03) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-07-28) |
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-08-01) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jun 2014 02:27:28 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
References: | 14-06-010 14-06-016 |
Keywords: | standards, comment |
Posted-Date: | 21 Jun 2014 12:22:02 EDT |
Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> wrote:
(snip)
> Two very important cases not following this practice: Algol68, which
> used van Wijngaarten notation ("VWG"), and Ada where the standard is
> defined by a test suite. There are Ada manuals, but if the manual
> differs from the suite then the suite governs.
Not so long ago, regarding a question that I think was from this
group, but maybe a different one, I downloaded the Algol-68
description. I could see that the information was there, but it was
too hard to figure out the answer to the question.
I have an actual book on Algol-60.
-- glen
[I had the same problem, the Algol68 language is great, but the
description is impenetrable. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.