Re: Formatting of Language LRMs

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Sat, 21 Jun 2014 02:27:28 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Formatting of Language LRMs seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2014-06-17)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2014-06-20)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-06-20)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-06-21)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-06-21)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs Pidgeot18@verizon.net.invalid (=?UTF-8?B?Sm9zaHVhIENyYW5tZXIg8J+Qpw==?=) (2014-06-22)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs mertesthomas@gmail.com (2014-06-30)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-07-03)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-07-28)
Re: Formatting of Language LRMs federation2005@netzero.com (2014-08-01)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 02:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: 14-06-010 14-06-016
Keywords: standards, comment
Posted-Date: 21 Jun 2014 12:22:02 EDT

Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> wrote:


(snip)


> Two very important cases not following this practice: Algol68, which
> used van Wijngaarten notation ("VWG"), and Ada where the standard is
> defined by a test suite. There are Ada manuals, but if the manual
> differs from the suite then the suite governs.


Not so long ago, regarding a question that I think was from this
group, but maybe a different one, I downloaded the Algol-68
description. I could see that the information was there, but it was
too hard to figure out the answer to the question.


I have an actual book on Algol-60.


-- glen
[I had the same problem, the Algol68 language is great, but the
description is impenetrable. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.