Re: Is multi-level function return possible?

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:34:30 +0100

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[13 earlier articles]
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) (2014-03-14)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2014-03-15)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? usenet@bitblocks.com (Bakul Shah) (2014-03-15)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? noitalmost@cox.net (noitalmost) (2014-03-15)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2014-03-16)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2014-03-16)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? news@cuboid.co.uk (Andy Walker) (2014-03-16)
Re: Is multi-level function return possible? yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk (Bill Findlay) (2014-03-17)
[11 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:34:30 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 14-03-020 14-03-022 14-03-031 14-03-037
Keywords: Pascal, history, comment
Posted-Date: 15 Mar 2014 10:06:15 EDT

> [I thought the numeric labels were to look like Fortran. -John]


IMO it's a LL(1) thing. Statements cannot start with a number, so it
must be a label.


DoDi
[It's as good (or bad) a reason as any. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.