|Green Compiler ? email@example.com (Abid) (2012-12-20)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? firstname.lastname@example.org (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-12-23)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? email@example.com (Nils M Holm) (2012-12-23)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2012-12-24)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? firstname.lastname@example.org (Peter Dassow) (2012-12-26)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? email@example.com (2012-12-27)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? firstname.lastname@example.org (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-12-28)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid (Joshua Cranmer) (2012-12-27)|
|Re: Green Compiler ? email@example.com (Nils M Holm) (2012-12-28)|
|[15 later articles]|
|From:||"Nils M Holm" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:01:25 +0100|
Abid <email@example.com> wrote:
> Do we need to change this model and make it
> three dimensional by adding power axis in the search space?
In principle, I would say that higher execution speed equals more
grenn-ness. Less time spent dissipating heat means less energy
So the question actually is the same as ever: how to we make code
- How do we squeeze more meaning into fewer/faster instructions?
- How do we make code so small that it fits in caches?
- How do we organize code execution in such a way that cache
stalls are minimized? (Locality)
Nils M Holm < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g > www.t3x.org
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.