Related articles |
---|
Re: IBM mainframe compilers produce object code or invoke assembler? compilers@is-not-my.name (2011-04-27) |
Re: IBM mainframe compilers produce object code or invoke assembler? rivers@dignus.com (Thomas David Rivers) (2011-04-27) |
Re: IBM mainframe compilers produce object code or invoke assembler? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-04-27) |
Re: IBM mainframe compilers produce object code or invoke assembler? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-04-27) |
Re: IBM mainframe compilers produce object code or invoke assembler? arnold@skeeve.com (2011-04-29) |
From: | Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:05:38 -0400 |
Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
References: | 11-04-040 |
Keywords: | assembler |
Posted-Date: | 27 Apr 2011 19:30:18 EDT |
compilers@is-not-my.name wrote:
>Does anyone happen to know if the traditional IBM language products like
>COBOL, PL/I, FORTRAN etc. invoke the assembler internally to produce object
>code, or if they produce object code directly? ...
In general; they produce object code. The compilers have to take
advantage of object-specific features that are not available via the
assembler syntax.
The Dignus compilers produce assembler, and we have to provide our own
assembler that not only is IBM compatible, but also has support for
these features.
And, due to the various complexities of IBM assembler syntax, it's
frequently the case that the compile step is much faster than the
assemble step.
- Dave Rivers -
--
rivers@dignus.com Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
[What OS object features can't the usual IBM assemblers produce? -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.