From: | Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> |
Newsgroups: | comp.programming,comp.compilers,comp.editors |
Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:26:19 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | Stack Usenet News Service |
References: | 11-04-009 11-04-011 |
Keywords: | tools, editor |
Posted-Date: | 11 Apr 2011 11:29:40 EDT |
Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
) So what's missing? The filing part. One thing you can do to ensure a
) clear break of mindset is to store the code into a data base instead of
) text files. For a start, you could store it in a postgres database.
) There's a pg.el on the web, which let you communicate directly to
) postgres. You may store each definition in a different row.
NOOOO! Not Uniface again! I can tell you from experience that storing
code into a database instead of text files is absolutely horrible.
Of course, it looks great at the beginning when you're whipping up code
and you don't need to worry about file structure or whatever, but when it
grows bigger you're left with a horrible mess in a proprietary format.
And then you want to put the whole thing into some kind of version control
system, preferrably with multiple staging areas and whatnot, and then
you're *really* in trouble.
Here's a break of mindset for you: A filesystem is a database, but with the
added advantages that it's atransparent, and there are loads and loads of
existing tools that integrate with it, including version control, backup,
to name but a few.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.