Re: Builtin Interpretation

Philip Herron <herron.philip@googlemail.com>
Tue, 5 May 2009 10:16:06 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Builtin Interpretation herron.philip@googlemail.com (Philip Herron) (2009-04-29)
Re: Builtin Interpretation bartc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2009-05-03)
Re: Builtin Interpretation herron.philip@googlemail.com (Philip Herron) (2009-05-05)
Re: Builtin Interpretation cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-05-06)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:16:06 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 09-05-001 09-05-015
Keywords: interpreter
Posted-Date: 05 May 2009 10:49:55 EDT

Hey


Thanks!


BartC <bartc@freeuk.com> wrote in message
> In one of my interpreted languages, these declarations look like:
>
> library "crtdll"
> ...
> clang function fopen (istring,istring)int
>
> library "kernel32"
> ...
> windows function DeleteFileA <erasefile> (istring)int
>
> (istring means something like char*, and maybe that library should be
> msvcrt.dll..)


This is a nice idea of doing it, i was thinking of maby having some
kind of __builtin__fopen() or somthing, but i think if i do what you
do, as in loadlib and it has a subset of functions i know as builtins
works a little better.


Was something bugging me and did really know which is the nicest way
of doing this.


Thanks!


-Phil
http://redbrain.co.uk


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.