Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form

Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:05:08 +0000

From comp.compilers

Related articles
[33 earlier articles]
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form bartc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2009-03-11)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-10)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-03-12)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-03-12)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-14)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-03-15)
*Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop)* (2009-03-15)**

From:	Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Newsgroups:	comp.compilers
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:05:08 +0000
Organization:	Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
References:	09-02-132 09-02-136 09-02-144 09-03-003 09-03-010 09-03-019 09-03-023 09-03-031 09-03-038 09-03-051
Keywords:	LLVM
Posted-Date:	15 Mar 2009 17:02:18 EDT

Bartc wrote:
> (And there's the minor problem of translating that horrible x86 syntax.)

Use one of the high-level interfaces as I did:

http://groups.google.com/group/fa.caml/msg/5aee553df34548e2

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u