Related articles |
---|
[32 earlier articles] |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2009-03-10) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form bartc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2009-03-11) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-10) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-03-12) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-03-12) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-14) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-03-15) |
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-03-15) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:03:21 +0000 |
Organization: | Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. |
References: | 09-02-132 09-02-136 09-02-144 09-03-003 09-03-010 09-03-019 09-03-023 09-03-034 09-03-042 09-03-052 09-03-055 09-03-059 |
Keywords: | LLVM |
Posted-Date: | 15 Mar 2009 17:01:56 EDT |
Tony wrote:
> I think that "IL as IR" does not extablish enough of an abstraction to
> be compelling (but whether something else is possible, I don't
> know). That's why I keep focusing on "AST as IR" as better suited for
> standardization...
If you want an AST as an IR then checkout the (new) HLVM project that is
built upon LLVM:
http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/hlvm-has-been-released.html
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.