Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form

"Tony" <tony@my.net>
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:43:00 -0600

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[15 earlier articles]
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-03-03)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2009-03-02)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2009-03-03)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-03)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form comp.lang.misc@inglorion.net (Robbert Haarman) (2009-03-04)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2009-03-05)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-05)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-03-06)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-03-06)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form bartc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2009-03-06)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form comp.lang.misc@inglorion.net (Robbert Haarman) (2009-03-06)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-03-06)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-03-07)
[12 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Tony" <tony@my.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:43:00 -0600
Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/
References: 09-02-132 09-02-136 09-02-144 09-03-003 09-03-014 <fRhrl.13260$8_3.4266@flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com> 09-03-020
Keywords: code
Posted-Date: 06 Mar 2009 06:39:40 EST

"Robbert Haarman" <comp.lang.misc@inglorion.net> wrote in message
> [Cross-posting so that everybody who followed the original thread gets
> the message too.]
>
> I also feel that the world would benefit from a good common
> intermediate language. In fact, I think it would be good to have a
> number of them, at different levels and with different features. For
> myself, and for everybody who is interested in using them, I am
> developing at least two such languages.


Note that I said "intermediate form" rather than "intermediate
language". "Intermediate representation" (IR) is probably more common
than "intermediate form" though. An intermediate language is generated
code and a bit farther down the line than the IR I was concerned with,
which is probably an AST.


Tony



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.