Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form

Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:20:04 +0000

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form georgeps@xmission.com (George Peter Staplin) (2009-02-26)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form bartc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2009-02-27)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-02-28)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-02-28)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form tony@my.net (Tony) (2009-02-28)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-03-01)
Re: What's lacking: a good intermediate form max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2009-03-02)
[25 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:20:04 +0000
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
References: 09-02-132 09-02-136
Keywords: code, UNCOL
Posted-Date: 28 Feb 2009 06:35:55 EST

George Peter Staplin wrote:
> I agree such a thing is lacking. LLVM is apparently good, but it
> requires working with their own code generation language from what I
> understand, or C++.


I am not sure what you perceive as a possible alternative to that but I am
writing an LLVM-based VM entirely in OCaml.


--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.