Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages?

Brad <bowes.brad@gmail.com>
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:05:00 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[21 earlier articles]
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? jgd@cix.compulink.co.uk (2008-12-06)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-12-06)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? jgd@cix.compulink.co.uk (2008-12-07)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? rpw3@rpw3.org (2008-12-08)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-12-08)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2008-12-08)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? bowes.brad@gmail.com (Brad) (2008-12-08)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-12-08)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-12-09)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? jasen@xnet.co.nz (Jasen Betts) (2008-12-09)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? efeustel@hughes.net (Edward Feustel) (2008-12-09)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2008-12-09)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-12-10)
[7 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Brad <bowes.brad@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.arch
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-12-014
Keywords: architecture
Posted-Date: 08 Dec 2008 18:16:26 EST

On Dec 4, 11:09 am, "Tony" <t...@my.net> wrote:
> To me, it seems like "reducing everything to a function" may be a bit
> dated given that OO languages are the thing nowadays. Can anyone
> imagine any new potential assembly language instructions that would
> make implemention of OO languages easier? (Not just necessarily the
> function thing, but anything).


Some sort of type flag to distinguish addresses (pointers) from data
words (values) might be helpful for garbage collection.
[Type bits were popular a long, long time ago, but fell out of fashion. -John]



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.