New assembly language instructions to support OO languages?

"Tony" <tony@my.net>
Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:09:50 -0600

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? tony@my.net (Tony) (2008-12-04)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? bert.hutchings@btinternet.com (bert) (2008-12-04)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? tmk@netvision.net.il (Michael Tiomkin) (2008-12-04)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? cg@graysage.com (Chris Gray) (2008-12-04)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2008-12-04)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-12-05)
Re: New assembly language instructions to support OO languages? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-12-05)
[36 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Tony" <tony@my.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.arch
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:09:50 -0600
Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/
Keywords: OOP, architecture, question
Posted-Date: 04 Dec 2008 15:05:14 EST

To me, it seems like "reducing everything to a function" may be a bit
dated given that OO languages are the thing nowadays. Can anyone
imagine any new potential assembly language instructions that would
make implemention of OO languages easier? (Not just necessarily the
function thing, but anything).


Tony


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.