Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [12 earlier articles] |
| Re: Writing a compiler marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2008-11-02) |
| Re: Writing a compiler chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2008-11-03) |
| Re: Writing a compiler lkrupp@pssw.com (Louis Krupp) (2008-11-03) |
| Re: Writing a compiler alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2008-11-03) |
| Re: Writing a compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-11-04) |
| Re: Writing a compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-11-04) |
| Re: Writing a compiler marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2008-11-06) |
| Re: Writing a compiler james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2008-11-09) |
| Re: Writing a compiler james.harris.1@googlemail.com (James Harris) (2008-11-09) |
| From: | Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:52:17 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization: | Stack Usenet News Service |
| References: | 08-10-037 08-10-046 08-10-047 08-11-003 08-11-008 08-11-009 08-11-025 |
| Keywords: | C++ |
| Posted-Date: | 06 Nov 2008 14:49:33 EST |
On 2008-11-05, George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> I see no reason why cfront couldn't implement all of C++; theoretically,
>>> there's no difference between generating C or assembler code.
>>This is not true if e.g. all chars that can be used in C identifiers are
>>also valid chars in C++. In assembler, usually a lot more special chars ($,@
>>often) can be used to separate the parts in a mangled name.
>
> That doesn't matter. The standard does not specify how to mangle
> names and, in fact, nearly every compiler does it differently.
Indeed, I forgot the escape based solution obviously.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.