From: | Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Sep 2008 14:38:19 +0100 (BST) |
Organization: | dotat labs |
References: | 08-09-076 08-09-110 08-09-115 08-09-119 |
Keywords: | errors |
Posted-Date: | 25 Sep 2008 11:45:59 EDT |
Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>
>So, I wonder, how many of you have experienced real compiler bugs,
>that you could verify was the compilers fault and not just "mysterious
>behavior" that could be fixed by changing the optimizer/debugger
>level?
Here's a paper which very cleverly surveys compilers for bugs in their
handling of the volatile type qualifier. They compile code using different
optimization levels and verify that its behaviour is consistent.
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/papers/emsoft08-preprint.pdf
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
SOUTH FITZROY: NORTHEASTERLY 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.