Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you seen?

ArarghMail809@Arargh.com
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:31:05 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Debug optimized code linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2008-09-16)
Re: Debug optimized code gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-09-20)
Re: Debug optimized code sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2008-09-22)
Re: Debug optimized code gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-09-23)
Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you seen? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-09-24)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se ArarghMail809@Arargh.com (2008-09-24)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se n.pipenbrinck@cubic.org (Nils) (2008-09-25)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2008-09-25)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-09-25)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2008-09-25)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-09-25)
Re: Was: Debug optimized code; Now: How many compiler bugs have you se jfc@mit.edu (2008-10-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ArarghMail809@Arargh.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:31:05 -0500
Organization: Ripco Communications Inc.
References: 08-09-076 08-09-105 08-09-110 08-09-115 08-09-119
Keywords: debug
Posted-Date: 24 Sep 2008 15:51:39 EDT

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:46:15 -0400, Chris F Clark
<cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:


<snip>
>So, I wonder, how many of you have experienced real compiler bugs,
>that you could verify was the compilers fault and not just "mysterious
>behavior" that could be fixed by changing the optimizer/debugger
>level?


It's been a while, but I have. It was the Microsoft Basic Compiler
Version 6 (The one between QB4.5 & PDS). Someone else & I spent about
a week isolating the problem and developing a small program that
showed the error. It worked on the previous version, and failed on
version 6. It was reported to MS and that's the last we ever heard.


And, of course, there is the well known bug in MASM 6:
  ...
  .data? (.bss space - not initialized)
  foo db 500000 dup (?)
  ...
Works, but takes forever. :-) But that's an assembler. :-)




As well as any bugs in BCET, but that's my problem. :-)
--
ArarghMail809 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html


To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.