Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops anw@cuboid.uk (2008-03-07) |
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops torbenm@app-2.diku.dk (2008-03-07) |
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-03-09) |
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-10) |
Re: localized languages, was call by name ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-03-14) |
Re: localized languages, was call by name torbenm@app-3.diku.dk (2008-03-14) |
Re: localized languages, was call by name alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2008-03-14) |
Re: localized languages, was call by name derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2008-03-15) |
From: | Alex Colvin <alexc@TheWorld.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:22:20 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
References: | 08-03-012 08-03-019 08-03-026 08-03-031 08-03-034 08-03-038 08-03-044 08-03-045 |
Keywords: | i18n, history |
Posted-Date: | 14 Mar 2008 19:02:29 EDT |
>Not to mention keywords.
>I have wondered about what non-english speakers think about the
>english keywords used in the usual programming languages.
>It might be that some use a preprocessor to replace language appropriate
>keywords, but I believe most just use the usual english words.
I believe Algol 68 provided for a national prologue to remap the reserved
words. Of course, since they were words like IF ... FI, CASE ... ESAC, DO
... OD, and phrases such as ... DO BEGIN ..., they didn't sound right to
English speakers either.
--
mac the naif
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.