Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:16:38 +0100

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
silly question: prefix vs postfix ops rosing@peakfive.com (MattR) (2008-03-03)
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-04)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops wclodius@los-alamos.net (2008-03-04)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops wclodius@los-alamos.net (2008-03-05)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops anw@cuboid.uk (2008-03-07)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops torbenm@app-2.diku.dk (2008-03-07)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-03-09)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-10)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops cbarron413@adelphia.net (Carl Barron) (2008-03-10)
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops wclodius@los-alamos.net (2008-03-10)
Re: localized keywords, was call by name DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-03-14)
Re: localized languages, was call by name ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-03-14)
Re: algol60 history, was call by name gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-14)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:16:38 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-03-012 08-03-019 08-03-026 08-03-031 08-03-034 08-03-038
Keywords: algol60, i18n
Posted-Date: 10 Mar 2008 14:23:51 EDT

Torben Fgidius Mogensen wrote:


> The Danish computer company Regnecentralen used Algol60 as the main
> programming language for their GIER computers.


The same for the German Telefunken machines (TR-4, TR-440).


I have the impression of an continental conflict of interests or
opinions, that prevented the jump of European ideas and work (Wirth...)
over the sea. The requirements for programs in non-English countries
have rarely been been reflected in programming languages (standard
libraries), character sets etc. With regards to Unicode I still have the
impression, that nothing but "if you need more characters, here's what
you want" has been understood about text processing or other habits and
requirements in other languages and cultures.


DoDi



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.