Re: Integers on 64-bit machines

Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:18:14 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[16 earlier articles]
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines torbenm@app-6.diku.dk (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-10)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines napi@axiomsol.com (napi) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines monnier@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier) (2007-07-14)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-16)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-19)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-19)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:18:14 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: 07-07-007 07-07-025 07-07-030 07-07-033 07-07-040
Keywords: arithmetic, design, history
Posted-Date: 15 Jul 2007 16:29:09 EDT

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> writes:


> John Mashey wrote an excellent history of the 32/64 bit transition:
> http://www.acmqueue.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=printer_friendly&pid=421&page=1


Thanks for the pointer. It was good reading and a welcome reminder as
these days I'm actually doing instruction set design (not intended to
be user accessible, but we all know how intentions like that fair) and
we are trying to fit things in an 8/16 bit world. It gives me a good
argument for laying down some 32 (and 64 bit) address instructions,
even though on the first implementation, the machine will just barely
have 12 bits of address space, and thus they won't get used.


Thanks,
-Chris


*****************************************************************************
Chris Clark Internet : compres@world.std.com
Compiler Resources, Inc. Web Site : http://world.std.com/~compres
23 Bailey Rd voice : (508) 435-5016
Berlin, MA 01503 USA fax : (978) 838-0263 (24 hours)


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.