Re: Integers on 64-bit machines

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
09 Jul 2007 17:37:10 +0100 (BST)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[13 earlier articles]
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-08)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-07-08)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines torbenm@app-6.diku.dk (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-10)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines napi@axiomsol.com (napi) (2007-07-13)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines monnier@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier) (2007-07-14)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-16)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 09 Jul 2007 17:37:10 +0100 (BST)
Organization: dotat labs
References: 07-07-007 07-07-025 07-07-030 07-07-033
Keywords: history
Posted-Date: 12 Jul 2007 22:05:37 EDT

Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>
>That's not the way I recall it and I was working on the Alpha Unix C
>compiler at the time. All of us, preferred the ILP64 model--the
>instruction set was much better suited to that model.


John Mashey wrote an excellent history of the 32/64 bit transition:
http://www.acmqueue.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=printer_friendly&pid=421&page=1


Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.