Re: rules to generate a context free grammar

Mike Burrell <mburrel@uwo.ca.easynews.com>
23 Apr 2007 08:52:46 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
rules to generate a context free grammar alinsoar@voila.fr (A Soare) (2007-04-23)
Re: rules to generate a context free grammar mburrel@uwo.ca.easynews.com (Mike Burrell) (2007-04-23)
Re: rules to generate a context free grammar cdsmith@twu.net (Chris Smith) (2007-04-29)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Mike Burrell <mburrel@uwo.ca.easynews.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Apr 2007 08:52:46 -0400
Organization: University of Western Ontario
References: 07-04-077
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 23 Apr 2007 08:52:46 EDT

On 2007-04-23 07:48:12 -0400, A Soare <alinsoar@voila.fr> said:
> I know that every set that can be generated by a computer can also be
> generated by a context free grammar.


That's not true. The set { a^n b^n c^n | n > 0 } for example, can be
generated by a computer, but not by a context-free grammar. Perhaps you
meant grammars in general, in which case it would be true: any set that
can be generated by a computer can be generated by a grammar.


> My question is: looking at the program that generates a set, can we
> deduce the context free grammar that generates it? There are some
> rules for my problem? If not, there are clear rules to write the
> grammar for a set?


For any program, you should be able to generate a grammar for it.
Generating a pretty grammar is another story haha. The general method
for doing this is to simulate each operation of the program as a rule
in the grammar. If you're simulating something with very few
instructions, such as a small Turing machine, it might not be so bad.
If you're taking on a program written on a modern ISA with all of its
thousands of instructions, well, good luck :)


Mike



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.