Related articles |
---|
RegExp to match against RegExp's alex.habar.nam@gmail.com (whiskey) (2007-03-01) |
Re: RegExp to match against RegExp's JoelCSalomon@Gmail.com (Joel C. Salomon) (2007-03-03) |
Re: RegExp to match against RegExp's rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2007-03-05) |
Re: RegExp to match against RegExp's dickey@saltmine.radix.net (Thomas Dickey) (2007-03-08) |
Re: RegExp to match against RegExp's alex.habar.nam@gmail.com (whiskey) (2007-03-14) |
From: | "Joel C. Salomon" <JoelCSalomon@Gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Mar 2007 23:33:35 -0500 |
Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
References: | 07-03-003 |
Keywords: | lex, parse, comment |
Posted-Date: | 03 Mar 2007 23:33:35 EST |
whiskey wrote:
> how would a regular expression that matches a regular
> expression look like ?
Which flavor of regexp? But that hardly matters; since parenthesis and
brackets must be matched in a valid regexp, regular expressions cannot
themselves be described by a regular language.
On Plan 9 systems, almost all regexp-using programs use the regexp
library. Its syntax is given in
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/6/regexp, in BNF. (A Unix
port is available at http://swtch.com/plan9port/unix/). POSIX regular
expressions are probably defined somewhere, I just don't know where.
--Joel
[POSIX REs are defined where you'd expect, in the POSIX standard. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.