Re: HLL design

"Bjarke Walling" <bjarke.walling@gmail.com>
28 Oct 2006 01:25:36 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: HLL design free4trample@yahoo.com (fermineutron) (2006-10-21)
Re: HLL design danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design idknow@gmail.com (idknow@gmail.com) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design amedlock@gmail.com (DavidM) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-26)
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-28)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Bjarke Walling" <bjarke.walling@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Oct 2006 01:25:36 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-10-08006-10-104 06-10-111
Keywords: design

Hans-Peter Diettrich skrev:
> Bjarke Walling wrote:
> > * My language is more or less independant of the architecture and
> > platform if I stick to the C standard. Ie. you can use another C
> > compiler to compile for your specific platform.
>
> More less, I think. If your language allows for filehandling and other
> OS specific features, your libraries are more important than the
> compiler, with regards to portability.


Yes, you are right. I try to solve this another way, but regarding the
question of fermineutron the libraries are more important to
portability.


- Bjarke Walling



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.