Re: HLL design

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-21)
Re: HLL design free4trample@yahoo.com (fermineutron) (2006-10-21)
Re: HLL design danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design idknow@gmail.com (idknow@gmail.com) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design amedlock@gmail.com (DavidM) (2006-10-24)
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-26)
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-10-08006-10-089 06-10-104
Keywords: design, translator
Posted-Date: 26 Oct 2006 00:29:19 EDT

Bjarke Walling wrote:


> * My language is more or less independant of the architecture and
> platform if I stick to the C standard. Ie. you can use another C
> compiler to compile for your specific platform.


More less, I think. If your language allows for filehandling and other
OS specific features, your libraries are more important than the
compiler, with regards to portability.


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.