Re: anyone interested in decompilation

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
15 Aug 2006 18:49:33 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-12)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-08-13)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-14)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-14)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-14)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation barry.j.kelly@gmail.com (Barry Kelly) (2006-08-15)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-15)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Aug 2006 18:49:33 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: <1154507032.629515.108580@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> 06-08-017 06-08-037 06-08-047 06-08-060 06-08-065 06-08-071
Keywords: C, Java

Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:


(snip)


> Java references translate well to managed .NET code, whereas C pointers
> only translate to unmanaged code, with all known risks.


In the usual implementations, C pointers translate to unmanaged
code, but C doesn't require that. There are many restrictions
in the C standard to allow for other representations.


-- glen



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.