Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [6 earlier articles] |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-12) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-08-13) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-14) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-14) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-14) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation barry.j.kelly@gmail.com (Barry Kelly) (2006-08-15) |
| Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-15) |
| From: | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 15 Aug 2006 18:49:33 -0400 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | <1154507032.629515.108580@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> 06-08-017 06-08-037 06-08-047 06-08-060 06-08-065 06-08-071 |
| Keywords: | C, Java |
| Posted-Date: | 15 Aug 2006 18:49:33 EDT |
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
(snip)
> Java references translate well to managed .NET code, whereas C pointers
> only translate to unmanaged code, with all known risks.
In the usual implementations, C pointers translate to unmanaged
code, but C doesn't require that. There are many restrictions
in the C standard to allow for other representations.
-- glen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.