Re: anyone interested in decompilation

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
8 Aug 2006 23:59:50 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Re: anyone interested in decompilation dcorbit@connx.com (2006-08-03)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2006-08-04)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2006-08-04)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-08)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (Juergen Kahrs) (2006-08-10)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation kym@ukato.freeshell.org (russell kym horsell) (2006-08-11)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-12)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-08-13)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-14)
Re: anyone interested in decompilation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-14)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Aug 2006 23:59:50 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: <1154507032.629515.108580@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> 06-08-017
Keywords: Java, disassemble
Posted-Date: 08 Aug 2006 23:59:50 EDT

dcorbit@connx.com wrote:


> QuantumG wrote:


>>Decompilation is the process of recovering human readable source code
>>from a program executable. Many decompilers exist for Java and .NET as
>>the program executables (class files) maintain much of the information
>>found in the source code. This is not true for machine code
>>executables however.


JVM isn't all that different from many machines. I think it is more
the exception model of Java that prohibits many optimizations that
otherwise might confuse decompilers.


>>In recent years decompilation for machine code has moved from the
>>domain of crackpots and academic hopefuls to a number of real
>>technologies that are available to the general public.


It is likely specific to a specific version of a compiler,
and will depend on the optimizations that the compiler does.


(snip)


> P.S.
> You can't turn the DNA of a dead cow back into a cow. That sort of
> thing only works on "Jurasic Park" movies.


There are people working on the Woolly Mammoth, though the probability
might not be so high. I would expect that some extinct organism will
be brought back in the not too distant future. It depends a lot on
the quality of the DNA, and finding a similar enough living organism
as an egg source.


-- glen



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.