Related articles |
---|
Re: anyone interested in decompilation dcorbit@connx.com (2006-08-03) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2006-08-04) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2006-08-04) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-08) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (Juergen Kahrs) (2006-08-10) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation kym@ukato.freeshell.org (russell kym horsell) (2006-08-11) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation chris.dollin@hp.com (Chris Dollin) (2006-08-12) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-08-13) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-08-14) |
Re: anyone interested in decompilation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-14) |
[4 later articles] |
From: | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Aug 2006 23:59:50 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | <1154507032.629515.108580@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> 06-08-017 |
Keywords: | Java, disassemble |
Posted-Date: | 08 Aug 2006 23:59:50 EDT |
dcorbit@connx.com wrote:
> QuantumG wrote:
>>Decompilation is the process of recovering human readable source code
>>from a program executable. Many decompilers exist for Java and .NET as
>>the program executables (class files) maintain much of the information
>>found in the source code. This is not true for machine code
>>executables however.
JVM isn't all that different from many machines. I think it is more
the exception model of Java that prohibits many optimizations that
otherwise might confuse decompilers.
>>In recent years decompilation for machine code has moved from the
>>domain of crackpots and academic hopefuls to a number of real
>>technologies that are available to the general public.
It is likely specific to a specific version of a compiler,
and will depend on the optimizations that the compiler does.
(snip)
> P.S.
> You can't turn the DNA of a dead cow back into a cow. That sort of
> thing only works on "Jurasic Park" movies.
There are people working on the Woolly Mammoth, though the probability
might not be so high. I would expect that some extinct organism will
be brought back in the not too distant future. It depends a lot on
the quality of the DNA, and finding a similar enough living organism
as an egg source.
-- glen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.