Related articles |
---|
What is the future of Compiler ? blertadn@yahoo.com (blerta bishaj) (2006-06-12) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? torbenm@app-1.diku.dk (2006-06-15) |
What is the future of Compiler ? inderaj@gmail.com (Inderaj Bains) (2006-06-15) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? englere_geo@yahoo.com (Eric) (2006-06-15) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) (2006-06-19) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? frido@q-software-solutions.de (Friedrich Dominicus) (2006-06-22) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? tommy.thorn@gmail.com (Tommy Thorn) (2006-07-05) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-07-06) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-07-19) |
What is the future of Compiler ? pschen@casd2.iie.ncku.edu.tw (1995-12-09) |
From: | Friedrich Dominicus <frido@q-software-solutions.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 Jun 2006 15:52:44 -0400 |
Organization: | Q Software Solutions GmbH |
References: | 06-06-044 06-06-051 06-06-056 |
Keywords: | OOP |
Posted-Date: | 22 Jun 2006 15:52:44 EDT |
Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> writes:
> Eric wrote:
> [...]
>> I see languages forking to some extent, but also they will take up
>> benefits of different models and use them. For example, C# 3.0 will use
>> lamda functions in some ways. This is a bridging of 2 seemingly
>> incompatible models.
> [...]
>
> Do you mean OO and FP with seemingly incompatible models?
>
> Look at OCaml, there you have both worlds together very well. :)
And it shows how Microsoft brainwashing works. Have you checked
Smalltalk it has full closures from it's beginning, Common Lisp has a
standardized Objects system, there does exist Mozart/Oz also. But who
C# did follow (probably with some brain dead syntax)
Friedrich
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.