Re: What is the future of Compiler ?

Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
19 Jun 2006 09:33:44 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
What is the future of Compiler ? blertadn@yahoo.com (blerta bishaj) (2006-06-12)
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? torbenm@app-1.diku.dk (2006-06-15)
What is the future of Compiler ? inderaj@gmail.com (Inderaj Bains) (2006-06-15)
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? englere_geo@yahoo.com (Eric) (2006-06-15)
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) (2006-06-19)
Re: What is the future of Compiler ? frido@q-software-solutions.de (Friedrich Dominicus) (2006-06-22)
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? tommy.thorn@gmail.com (Tommy Thorn) (2006-07-05)
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-07-06)
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-07-19)
What is the future of Compiler ? pschen@casd2.iie.ncku.edu.tw (1995-12-09)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Jun 2006 09:33:44 -0400
Organization: Individual Network Berlin e.V.
References: 06-06-044 06-06-051
Keywords: design

Eric wrote:
[...]
> I see languages forking to some extent, but also they will take up
> benefits of different models and use them. For example, C# 3.0 will use
> lamda functions in some ways. This is a bridging of 2 seemingly
> incompatible models.
[...]


Do you mean OO and FP with seemingly incompatible models?


Look at OCaml, there you have both worlds together very well. :)




Ciao,
        Oliver


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.