Related articles |
---|
Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-03) |
Re: Preview in grammar marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2006-05-04) |
Re: Preview in grammar haberg@math.su.se (2006-05-04) |
Re: Preview in grammar pbmann@gmail.com (2006-05-09) |
Re: Preview in grammar haberg@math.su.se (2006-05-09) |
Re: Preview in grammar DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-05-09) |
Re: Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-09) |
Re: Preview in grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-05-11) |
Re: Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-11) |
Re: Preview in grammar franku@fmi.uni-passau.de (Ulrich Frank) (2006-05-11) |
Re: Preview in grammar Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de (Detlef Meyer-Eltz) (2006-05-12) |
Re: Preview in grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-05-12) |
Re: Preview in grammar pbmann@gmail.com (2006-05-12) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | "Ulrich Frank" <franku@fmi.uni-passau.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 May 2006 00:54:35 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 06-05-01106-05-015 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 09 May 2006 00:54:35 EDT |
Hello Hans,
thanks for this really important info, that LALR(1) is not suitable for
error reporting. However in SableCC a good error reporting is realized,
although SableCC also is LALR(1). I think this can be realized because
the lookahead token are not calculated at runtimethe but at the same
time the parser is gettiing generated from the grammar.
So I have to possibilities: either I realize the calculation of the
lookahead token like in sablecc or I take an LR(1) parser.
I haven't searched for a LR(1) parser generator yet (I will do this
after this message ;), but do you know a good one?
Ulrich Frank
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.