Related articles |
---|
[7 earlier articles] |
Re: A Plain English Compiler haberg@math.su.se (2006-02-19) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2006-02-19) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2006-02-19) |
A Plain English Compiler djg@tramontana.co.hu (DEÁK JAHN, Gábor) (2006-02-19) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2006-02-20) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler help@osmosian.com (2006-02-20) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler tameri@comcast.net (Scott Wyatt) (2006-02-24) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler gene@abhost.us (Gene Wirchenko) (2006-03-12) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com (2014-10-24) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler lesliedellow@gmail.com (2014-10-25) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2014-10-25) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2014-10-27) |
Re: A Plain English Compiler ak@akkartik.com (Kartik Agaram) (2014-10-27) |
[11 later articles] |
From: | Scott Wyatt <tameri@comcast.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Feb 2006 18:00:30 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-02-122 |
Keywords: | design, comment |
Posted-Date: | 24 Feb 2006 18:00:29 EST |
Languages like AppleScript / Xtalk (sp?) found in Runtime Revolution,
SuperCard (HyperCard), and throughout the Mac world are a complete pain
when you try to figure out what some routines will do.
The problem with "English" is meaning. The "Definitive Guide to
AppleScript" begins with a discussion of just how confusing English can
be as a programming language.
Sure, I want an "easy to read" programming language, but that doesn't
mean it should be like English. English is often mangled -- I admit as a
college English teacher.
A computer language should never be ambiguous. English thrives on its
ambiguity. Sorry, but programming needs rules and limits.
- Scott
[My understanding was that the hope for Cobol was not that it would be
any easier to write than other languages, but that it would be easier
for non-experts to read. One can debate how well they met that
goal. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.