|Back end generator alternatives? firstname.lastname@example.org (Mr.E) (2006-01-26)|
|Re: Back end generator alternatives? email@example.com (Uncle Noah) (2006-01-28)|
|Re: Back end generator alternatives? firstname.lastname@example.org (Vladimir Makarov) (2006-01-31)|
|Re: Back end generator alternatives? email@example.com (Helmut Emmelmann) (2006-01-31)|
|From:||Vladimir Makarov <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||31 Jan 2006 00:34:13 -0500|
|Organization:||Red Hat, Inc.|
|Posted-Date:||31 Jan 2006 00:34:13 EST|
> Are there good back end generator outside of BEG. I done some research
> and have been only able to find a few which are:
> Burg, New Jersey Machine-Code Toolkit and some company in France that I
> cant recall (possibly PAGODE?).
You could use NONA which is part of COCOM toolset http://cocom.sf.net
Its description can be found on http://cocom.sourceforge.net/nona.html
IMHO, it is more flexible than IBURG plus it can work on DAG not only
on trees. It was used in serious projects like extended Pascal
COCOM itself is distributed under GPL.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.