Related articles |
---|
Back end generator alternatives? mr.waverlye@verizon.net (Mr.E) (2006-01-26) |
Re: Back end generator alternatives? nkavv@skiathos.physics.auth.gr (Uncle Noah) (2006-01-28) |
Re: Back end generator alternatives? vmakarov@redhat.com (Vladimir Makarov) (2006-01-31) |
Re: Back end generator alternatives? emmel@h-e-i.de (Helmut Emmelmann) (2006-01-31) |
From: | "Mr.E" <mr.waverlye@verizon.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Jan 2006 14:20:37 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Keywords: | code, tools, question, comment |
Posted-Date: | 26 Jan 2006 14:20:31 EST |
Are there good back end generator outside of BEG. I done some research
and have been only able to find a few which are:
Burg, New Jersey Machine-Code Toolkit and some company in France that I
cant recall (possibly PAGODE?).
From my research BEG appears to be a great product but I emailed the
company to find out about their product BEG and Firm. I got no
response to a few emails so I called them in Germany. I was told the
product could be from $10-25k depending upon the level of optimization
I wanted. Based on google searches I found the cost over the years
was anywhere from $250 to $2000. I'd like to use a backend generator
to save myself time and frustration. I want the best but at the same
time I'm not trying to get taken for a ride.
iBurg was used in the LCC compiler seemed like an excellent option. I
love what Fraser & Hanson have done over the years with their
generator but it isnt comercially available.
Thanks,
W.
[The iBurg license approximately says you can use it and use the
result in a commercial product with attribution. If that's not what
you plan to do, write to the authors and see if you can come to
terms. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.