Re: Machine language and assembler translators?

Martin Ward <Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk>
26 Jul 2005 13:16:46 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? jcrens@earthlink.net (Jack Crenshaw) (2005-07-17)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-07-22)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2005-07-22)
Re:Machine language and assembler translators? Robert.Thorpe@antenova.com (Robert Thorpe) (2005-07-22)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? peter.jinks@manchester.ac.uk (Pete Jinks) (2005-07-22)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-07-26)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk (Martin Ward) (2005-07-26)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? haberg@math.su.se (2005-07-28)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? jjk@acm.org (Jens Kilian) (2005-07-28)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? pohjalai@cc.helsinki.fi (A Pietu Pohjalainen) (2005-07-28)
Re: Machine language and assembler translators? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-07-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Martin Ward <Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Jul 2005 13:16:46 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-06-103 05-07-076 05-07-084
Keywords: architecture
Posted-Date: 26 Jul 2005 13:16:46 EDT

On Saturday 23 Jul 2005 01:17, you wrote:
> Features of the pentium 4 can be traced back to the 8080, 30 years ago.


How similar are the 8080 and the 4040 (and its 4 bit predecessor, the 4004)?
Did any 4004 features survive to the pentium 4?
I believe the 4004 was the first ever microprocessor.


--
Martin


Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/ Erdos number: 4

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.