Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from natural language to C++)

kleinecke@astound.net
18 May 2005 00:48:26 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from natura shakti.misra@wipro.com (DeltaOne) (2005-05-16)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-16)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-05-16)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na joe@burgershack.com (Randy) (2005-05-16)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na kleinecke@astound.net (2005-05-18)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2005-05-18)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na daffra.claudio@gmail.com (claudio daffa) (2013-11-07)
Re: A Compiler for Natural Language (transator that translates from na itz@buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) (2013-11-18)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: kleinecke@astound.net
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 May 2005 00:48:26 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 05-05-141
Keywords: translator
Posted-Date: 18 May 2005 00:48:26 EDT

DeltaOne wrote:


> the
> idea is to desing a compiler that learns language like human learn. I
> am explaining my idea little bit. This compiler is a natural language
> system That is near to an expert system. The aim of the system is to
> convert natural language statements into C++ (or any other
> language,but we need to feed that language structure into this
> application).


You might be interested in what goes on in the newsgroup called
rec.games.int-fiction or its cousin rec.games.int-fiction. Here is a
readily accessible, provided you are computer literate, mass of work
by some very clever people. These people are actually interacting with
the computer in an approximation to natural language. Nothing
academic.


If you must try technical linguistics I suggest Gazdar, Klein, Pullum
and Sag "Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar". It came out in 1985
and is now considered completely obsolete. But it does not dismiss
things like you are interested in out of hand and it is informed about
computer science. My guess is that if you actually read GPSG you will
change your goals.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.