Related articles |
---|
Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? matt@mengland.net (Matt) (2005-05-14) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? raps72583m@spambob.com (Rapscallion) (2005-05-14) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? ivr@grad.com (Ioannis Vranos) (2005-05-14) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? tmk@netvision.net.il (Michael Tiomkin) (2005-05-14) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-05-15) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? walter@digitalmars.com (Walter) (2005-05-15) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? jkherciueh@gmx.net (Kai-Uwe Bux) (2005-05-15) |
Re: Howto obfuscate OBJECT code (and not source code)? DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2005-05-15) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | "Rapscallion" <raps72583m@spambob.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.c++,comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 May 2005 16:46:43 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 05-05-092 |
Keywords: | C++, code |
Posted-Date: | 14 May 2005 16:46:43 EDT |
Matt wrote:
> I have object/machine code in static library (written and compiled
> using C++) that I wish to make difficult to reverse-engineer. I am
> told by others that some could reverse-engineer this object/machine
> code to generate some or all of the source, and while it may not be a
> trivial task, it would not be impossible.
Haha, demonstrate it! I give you the cake and you reproduce the eggs,
ok? But seriously, no offense intended, 95% of all C++ code is not
worth to be stolen!
Best wishes,
R.C.
[Someone else pointed out that Java bytecode is a lot higher level and
a lot easier to decompile than machine language, whether from C++ or
any other language. I'd think that C++ would be particularly hard to
decompile because templates and overloading generate really bloated,
messy object code. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.