|C/C++ obfuscator email@example.com (Abbas) (2005-01-22)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator lkrupp@pssw.NOSPAM.com.INVALID (Louis Krupp) (2005-01-24)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator firstname.lastname@example.org (Walter Banks) (2005-01-24)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator email@example.com (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2005-01-25)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator firstname.lastname@example.org (George Neuner) (2005-01-25)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator lkrupp@pssw.NOSPAM.com.INVALID (Louis Krupp) (2005-01-30)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator email@example.com (Ira Baxter) (2005-01-30)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2005-02-03)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator email@example.com (2005-02-03)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2005-02-06)|
|Re: C/C++ obfuscator email@example.com (Louis Krupp) (2005-02-06)|
|From:||George Neuner <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||25 Jan 2005 23:25:10 -0500|
|Posted-Date:||25 Jan 2005 23:25:10 EST|
On 22 Jan 2005 18:29:26 -0500, "Abbas" <email@example.com> wrote:
> What I am looking for is more control flow obfuscator and data flow
>obfuscator, these obfuscator make the flow of the program more
>complex, while obtaining its original functionality. The dynamic
>analysis of the program execution becomes much more difficult by
>multiple nesting of placebo code and the insertion of placebo code.
>Does any one have any idea of the commercial available tools.
Obfuscating control flow is a *really* bad idea. I understand your
desire to protect your work, but if you ever get into an intellectual
propery dispute, it will come back to haunt you.
To prove infringement where there is not a clear case of direct
copying, you will have to show that a decompilation of [some portion
of] the suspect program is substantially similar to your sources. The
judge will likely understand that variable names can't be matched and
will make some allowances for differing data types, but you can be
certain she will not be understanding if you can't show corresponding
control flow ... the essence of the algorithm is absolutely crucial to
your claims of invention or authorship.
If you used an obfuscation tool which can change control flow, you had
better be able to establish the complete range of possible variations
that the tool can introduce given your source. If the tool appears to
make non-repeatable or arbitrary changes, the defense can claim that
chance is responsible for similarities between your program and theirs
- and you will be in a poor position to refute that.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.