Re: Using Bison and Delphi

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
26 Nov 2004 22:44:39 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-11-17)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-19)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-11-20)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-26)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi vbdis@aol.com (2004-11-28)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2004-11-28)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi mikehahn@rogers.com (Mike Hahn) (2004-12-05)
Re: Using Bison and Delphi strohm@airmail.net (John R. Strohm) (2004-12-06)
Ada use of parens vs brackets arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) (2004-12-11)
Re: Ada use of parens vs brackets mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2004-12-13)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Nov 2004 22:44:39 -0500
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 04-11-078
Keywords: yacc, Pascal
Posted-Date: 26 Nov 2004 22:44:39 EST

"Mike Hahn" <mikehahn@rogers.com> schreibt:


>= foo (bar func1 (arg1, arg2,... ) func2 (arg1, arg2,... ));


Okay, with such a syntax the dot operators may be omitted. But without the
comma-separated argument lists (as in the original posting) it would be almost
impossible. Remember:


>foo mymethod (arg1 arg2... );


Did you also consider how to access class fields instead of class methods,
methods without parameters, and the handling of an (implied?) Self/this object
reference?


DoDi

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.