Related articles |
---|
generic assembly language available? choksheak@yahoo.com (ChokSheak Lau) (2004-07-13) |
Re: generic assembly language available? basile-news@starynkevitch.net (Basile Starynkevitch \[news\]) (2004-07-13) |
Re: generic assembly language available? gopi@sankhya.com (2004-07-14) |
Re: generic assembly language available? choksheak@yahoo.com (ChokSheak Lau) (2004-07-14) |
Re: generic assembly language available? phil@ultimate.com (2004-07-15) |
Re: generic assembly language available? arnold@skeeve.com (2004-07-15) |
Re: generic assembly language available? gergoe@math.bme.hu (2004-07-17) |
Re: generic assembly language available? bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (2004-08-09) |
Re: generic assembly language available? jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2004-08-23) |
Re: generic assembly language available? brown@cs.bris.ac.uk (Julian Brown) (2004-08-25) |
From: | phil@ultimate.com (Phil Budne) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 15 Jul 2004 16:33:09 -0400 |
Organization: | Comcast Online |
References: | 04-07-018 04-07-038 04-07-040 |
Keywords: | design, assembler |
Posted-Date: | 15 Jul 2004 16:33:09 EDT |
>[See if you can find info about LIL, a little low level implementation
>language built at Bell Labs in the 1970s. It worked fine, but they
>found that anything it could do, C could do just as well so there was
>no point. -John]
I have a web page devoted to LIL; PJP graciosly supplied copies of a
paper and two BTL memos (which DMR helped provide clearance to release);
http://www.ultimate.com/phil/lil/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.