Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| generic assembly language available? choksheak@yahoo.com (ChokSheak Lau) (2004-07-13) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? basile-news@starynkevitch.net (Basile Starynkevitch \[news\]) (2004-07-13) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? gopi@sankhya.com (2004-07-14) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? choksheak@yahoo.com (ChokSheak Lau) (2004-07-14) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? phil@ultimate.com (2004-07-15) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? arnold@skeeve.com (2004-07-15) |
| Re: generic assembly language available? gergoe@math.bme.hu (2004-07-17) |
| [3 later articles] |
| From: | "ChokSheak Lau" <choksheak@yahoo.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 13 Jul 2004 12:08:27 -0400 |
| Organization: | Georgia Institute of Technology |
| Keywords: | assembler, question |
| Posted-Date: | 13 Jul 2004 12:08:27 EDT |
Hi all,
I get a feeling that gcc RTL seems to be the most generic kind of
intermediate code that exists today. I am interested in playing with
some kind of generic assembly language, or writing it, so that when we
write a compiler to target that language, the code generator will take
care of the rest. The thing about RTL is that it is not very human
friendly, like real asm code.
The closest analogy to what I am talking about is the Parrot language,
which is the interpreter engine for Perl 6. of cos, that could not be
easily converted into machine code because it was not designed to do
that.
My guess is that no such generic assembly language exists today.
Please email me to let me know I'm wrong. Thanks.
chok
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.