Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Haskell or OCAML? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2004-03-06) |
| Re: Haskell or OCAML? joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2004-03-11) |
| From: | Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 6 Mar 2004 13:43:10 -0500 |
| Organization: | The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA |
| Keywords: | functional, question |
| Posted-Date: | 06 Mar 2004 13:43:10 EST |
Not, to start a functional language war, but I'm curious as to some
recommendations from this group as to whether I should learn Haskel or
OCAML first as a functional language given that my interest is
learning how such languages influence compiler design, in particular
how higher order functions and pattern matching make building
compilers easier.
The point is before I add "built-in" visitor and attribute support to
Yacc++, I think I should understand the features and benefits of
functional languages, so that I can include them in Yacc++'s semantic
model.
Adivce is appreciated,
-Chris
*****************************************************************************
Chris Clark Internet : compres@world.std.com
Compiler Resources, Inc. Web Site : http://world.std.com/~compres
23 Bailey Rd voice : (508) 435-5016
Berlin, MA 01503 USA fax : (978) 838-0263 (24 hours)
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.