Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
17 Jul 2003 00:39:20 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[10 earlier articles]
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language monnier+comp.compilers/news/@cs-www.cs.yale.edu (Stefan Monnier) (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language haberg@matematik.su.se (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language lars@bearnip.com (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language RLake@oxfam.org.pe (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language dmr@bell-labs.com (Dennis Ritchie) (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2003-07-17)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 17 Jul 2003 00:39:20 -0400
Organization: dotat labs
References: 03-05-211 03-06-106 03-07-012 03-07-089
Keywords: GC
Posted-Date: 17 Jul 2003 00:39:20 EDT

ericmuttta@email.com (Eric) wrote:
>I notice here, that you refer to "pure" reference-count GC, implying
>that some GC's are "hybrid" and combine reference-counting and some
>other scheme (supposeddly mark-and-sweep). How would such a hybrid GC
>work? any papers on the subject?


Try using Google or CiteSeer.


http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/rej/gc.html#Bibliography


Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.