Re: Compiler writers will love this language

ericmuttta@email.com (Eric)
15 Jul 2003 14:49:29 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[20 earlier articles]
Re: Compiler writers will love this language genew@mail.ocis.net (2003-07-02)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-07-02)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language mwotton@cse.unsw.edu.au (2003-07-03)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-07-04)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-07-04)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language joachim.durchholz@web.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-07-13)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-07-15)
Re: Compiler writers will love this language nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-07-15)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language lars@bearnip.com (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language RLake@oxfam.org.pe (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language dmr@bell-labs.com (Dennis Ritchie) (2003-07-17)
Re: Storage management, was Compiler writers will love this language dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2003-07-17)
Re: GC strategies, was Compiler writers will love this language dobes@dobesland.com (Dobes Vandermeer) (2003-07-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ericmuttta@email.com (Eric)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Jul 2003 14:49:29 -0400
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
References: 03-05-211 03-06-015 03-06-054 03-06-057 03-06-078 03-06-106 03-07-012
Keywords: storage
Posted-Date: 15 Jul 2003 14:49:28 EDT

> [Pure reference-count garbage collectors have problems with circular
> structures that point to themselves.]


I notice here, that you refer to "pure" reference-count GC, implying
that some GC's are "hybrid" and combine reference-counting and some
other scheme (supposeddly mark-and-sweep). How would such a hybrid GC
work? any papers on the subject?


> Note that a doubly-linked list falls into this category...


Cheers, E.
[I think I've seen descriptions of GC that use reference counts in places
where they're known to be safe, other kinds elsewhere. -John]



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.