Related articles |
---|
Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-05-29) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language torbenm@diku.dk (2003-06-03) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-03) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-06-05) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-06-05) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language mwotton@cse.unsw.edu.au (2003-06-08) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language vbdis@aol.com (2003-06-08) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language genew@mail.ocis.net (2003-06-08) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-06-20) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-06-20) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-06-20) |
Re: Compiler writers will love this language ericmuttta@email.com (2003-06-20) |
[39 later articles] |
From: | mwotton@cse.unsw.edu.au (Mark Alexander Wotton) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Jun 2003 21:57:18 -0400 |
Organization: | Mare's Nest Collective |
References: | 03-05-211 03-06-015 03-06-054 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 08 Jun 2003 21:57:18 EDT |
On 5 Jun 2003 23:22:01 -0400, Eric posted:
>
> I am having difficulty imagining a type which is implemented using
> pointers and ensures that null cant occur. This would imply that for a
> variable of such a type, memory would be allocated and then never
> released.
Either that, or only released when all references to it have passed
out of scope. This is how many modern garbage-collected language
implementations work.
mrak
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.