Related articles |
---|
compiler target? tgunlien@yahoo.com (Tom Lien) (2003-03-14) |
Re: compiler target? jgd@cix.co.uk (2003-03-16) |
From: | jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 16 Mar 2003 23:56:16 -0500 |
Organization: | Nextra UK |
References: | 03-03-071 |
Keywords: | translator |
Posted-Date: | 16 Mar 2003 23:56:16 EST |
tgunlien@yahoo.com (Tom Lien) wrote:
> My question is, if you were involved in this project, what would you
> generate from the AST? We don't want to target a particular assembly
> language because it is not portable. Would you recommend compiling down
> to another language such as c or c++. Or what about targeting a virtual
> machine (java, .net)? Are there other options we should consider?
For a first shot at this kind of thing, targeting C or C++, whichever
looks easiest, seem the best thing to do. The first question for a new
programming language is always "how useful is it, in action?" and
being able to modify it relatively easily as you experiment is a good
idea. If compiling to another language imposes unacceptable overheads,
fixing that is best left until you've proved your creation is useful.
---
John Dallman jgd@cix.co.uk
"C++ - the FORTRAN of the early 21st century."
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.