Related articles |
---|
compiler target? tgunlien@yahoo.com (Tom Lien) (2003-03-14) |
Re: compiler target? jgd@cix.co.uk (2003-03-16) |
From: | Tom Lien <tgunlien@yahoo.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Mar 2003 11:26:25 -0500 |
Organization: | AT&T Broadband |
Keywords: | design, code, question |
Posted-Date: | 14 Mar 2003 11:26:25 EST |
I, and another programmer are endeavoring to create a language most
similar to c++, with in-language support for constraints on parametric
polymorphism, well-integrated preprocessing features, anonymous lambda
functions, and typesafe functions with arbitrary arguments (i.e typesafe
printf), amongst other things. We are using a c++ library called Spirit
(http://spirit.sourceforge.net) for our lexer/parser/AST generation.
My question is, if you were involved in this project, what would you
generate from the AST? We don't want to target a particular assembly
language because it is not portable. Would you recommend compiling down
to another language such as c or c++. Or what about targeting a virtual
machine (java, .net)? Are there other options we should consider?
Thanks in advance.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.