Related articles |
---|
MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers curtisdisa@mindspring.com (Curtis and Disa) (2002-04-21) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers a.richards@codeplay.com (Andrew Richards) (2002-04-23) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers a.richards@codeplay.com (Andrew Richards) (2002-04-24) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers snowwolf@diku.dk (Allan Sandfeld Jensen) (2002-04-24) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers dave@icmfp.com (2002-04-29) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers jgd@cix.co.uk (2002-04-29) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-05-01) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers a.richards@codeplay.com (Andrew Richards) (2002-05-01) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers cparpart@surakware.net (Christian Parpart) (2002-05-03) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2002-05-04) |
Re: MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 compilers a.richards@codeplay.com (Andrew Richards) (2002-05-08) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | dave@icmfp.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 29 Apr 2002 01:51:21 -0400 |
Organization: | ntl Cablemodem News Service |
References: | 02-04-126 02-04-137 02-04-146 |
Keywords: | code, GCC |
Posted-Date: | 29 Apr 2002 01:51:20 EDT |
>>> What compilers support any of the MMX/3Dnow!/SSE/SSE2 instruction sets
>>> (and optimize code for them)? Do you know of any published
>>> comparisons of such compilers?
> The upcomming GCC 3.1 (The extensions was developed for x86-64 by Suse
> and AMD) and of course Intel's icc
Is there any documentation on what GCC will be able to do in this
respect? I have heard many reports of automatic vectorization
support, and have used some (very old) patches which added automatic
use of MMX instructions and registers, but the performance increase
was minimal due to the poor code generated. Have things improved a
lot since then?
Dave
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.