Related articles |
---|
Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device nou.dadoun@polycom.com (2002-04-23) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device dr_feriozi@prodigy.net (SLK Parsers) (2002-04-24) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device k.prasad@attbi.com (Kamal R. Prasad) (2002-04-29) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device haberg@matematik.su.se (2002-05-01) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device iddw@hotmail.com (2002-05-03) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device joachim.durchholz@munich.netsurf.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-05-03) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device haberg@matematik.su.se (2002-05-04) |
Re: Parser Generators for Multiple Protocols in an Embedded Device k.prasad@attbi.com (Kamal R. Prasad) (2002-05-04) |
From: | "Kamal R. Prasad" <k.prasad@attbi.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc |
Date: | 29 Apr 2002 01:47:45 -0400 |
Organization: | AT&T Broadband |
References: | 02-04-133 |
Keywords: | C, C++, comment |
Posted-Date: | 29 Apr 2002 01:47:45 EDT |
Im pretty sure that the binary from C++ code has a much larger
footprint than the one from an equivalent C code. seems unilikely
that anybody would use anything besides C and assembly to write
embedded code.
-kamal
[I think you might be surprised. It entirely depends on what libraries
you use. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.