Related articles |
---|
Dope-Vectors for low energy compliers verma@ls12sr.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Manish Verma) (2002-03-11) |
Re: Dope-Vectors for low energy compliers sumesh_uk@hotmail.com (sumesh) (2002-03-17) |
Re: Dope-Vectors for low energy compliers nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2002-03-19) |
From: | sumesh <sumesh_uk@hotmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 17 Mar 2002 23:10:08 -0500 |
Organization: | The George Washington University |
References: | 02-03-055 |
Keywords: | storage, optimize |
Posted-Date: | 17 Mar 2002 23:10:08 EST |
There has been some reserach already on the data allocation problem at the
level of an array . I guess data /source transformations can be used to
achieve a finer granularity .
A few papers you might want to look at
1.off-chip vs On chip memory : the data partitioning problem in embedded
processor based systems
by preeti ranjan panda et al university of california , irvie
2.memory energy mangement using software and hardware directed power control
delaluz et al
pennsylvania state university
sumesh
"Manish Verma" <verma@ls12sr.cs.uni-dortmund.de> wrote in message
> I am Phd student working on Low Energy Compilers and I have the
> following ques tion. Why do we need to store the Array(Data) in
> consecutive memory areas. We co uld use something like Dope-Vectors
> (the way HPF/Fortran uses) and then divide the array on different
> memories( Scratch-pad or main memory). I need help as I am confused
> as how to do this allocation and when is it worthwhile to do divide
> the data or rather is it worthwhile to divide the data. And try to
> optimise energy.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.