Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Java compiler optimizations? suganya@cdacb.ernet.in (suganya) (2001-01-04) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? iank@idiom.com (2001-01-05) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? wangzy@usa.net (Zhiyong Wang) (2001-01-09) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? C.vanReeuwijk@twi.tudelft.nl (Kees van Reeuwijk) (2001-01-09) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2001-01-09) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? iank@idiom.com (2001-01-11) |
| Re: Java compiler optimizations? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2001-01-18) |
| From: | "Zhiyong Wang" <wangzy@usa.net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 9 Jan 2001 23:11:03 -0500 |
| Organization: | Purdue University |
| References: | 01-01-012 01-01-018 |
| Keywords: | Java, optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 09 Jan 2001 23:11:03 EST |
Once my prof. told me that the key difference is that Java is based on
a so-called stack machine model and there is no register in this
model. So the most important optimazation , register allocation , is
hard to be done in a java compiler. He did not say it's impossible
because somehow some reasearchers are trying to find a way around
it. This comment is for bytecode of java.
"Ian L. Kaplan" <iank@idiom.com> wrote in message
> In article suganya <suganya@cdacb.ernet.in> wrote:
> >What are the differences between the java compiler optimizations & other
> >compiler optimizations? And also give related sites and materials
> >available if so.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.