Re: Java compiler optimizations?

iank@idiom.com (Ian L. Kaplan)
5 Jan 2001 14:07:01 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Java compiler optimizations? suganya@cdacb.ernet.in (suganya) (2001-01-04)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? iank@idiom.com (2001-01-05)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? wangzy@usa.net (Zhiyong Wang) (2001-01-09)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? C.vanReeuwijk@twi.tudelft.nl (Kees van Reeuwijk) (2001-01-09)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2001-01-09)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? iank@idiom.com (2001-01-11)
Re: Java compiler optimizations? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2001-01-18)
Re: Java compiler optimizations chase@naturalbridge.com (David Chase) (2001-01-19)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: iank@idiom.com (Ian L. Kaplan)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 5 Jan 2001 14:07:01 -0500
Organization: Unknown
References: 01-01-012
Keywords: optimize, Java
Posted-Date: 05 Jan 2001 14:07:01 EST

In article suganya <suganya@cdacb.ernet.in> wrote:
>What are the differences between the java compiler optimizations & other
>compiler optimizations? And also give related sites and materials
>available if so.


    For a given class of compiler, I suspect that there is no difference
    between Java optimization and C++ optimization, for example.


    Because of the doctrinaire approach that Sun takes to Java, "Java
    compiler" usually means a compiler that generates JVM code.
    The optimizations that are done for JVM code would be different, in
    some cases, from antive code optimizations (e.g., some optimizations
    would be tarted at the stack nature of the code). But a Java
    compiler that generated native code would optimize code in a similar
    way to a native C++ compiler.


    Ian Kaplan
    iank@bearcave.com

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.